Gaurav K Verma & ANR. v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6575/2025 GAURAV K VERMA & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Kartik Kumar and Mr. Siddharth Bishnoi, Advocates.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Utkarsh, APP with SI Manish Dahiya and ASI Jyoti.

Mr. Trilok Chand and Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 16.09.2025 CRL.M.A. 27700/2025 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6575/2025 3.

Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 („BNSS‟) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners, for quashing of FIR No.0148/2025 under Sections 74/76/79/351(2)/115(2)/3(5) BNS, 2023, registered at PS: Rohini, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, in terms of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 28.07.2025.

4.

Issue Notice.

5.

Learned APP and learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 appearing on advance Notice, accept Notice.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

6.

As per the FIR, there was some quarrel took placed between the Petitioners and Respondent No.2 on account of money, due to which a fight also took place between them and present FIR got registered. 7.

It is further submitted that on 23.03.2025, on complaint of Respondent No.2, FIR No.0148/2025 under Sections 74/76/79/351(2)/115(2)/3(5) BNS, 2023 was registered at PS: Rohini, Delhi. 8.

It is submitted that present FIR was a consequence of the dispute between the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 with regard to payment of money. It is stated that the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled all their disputes and differences vide MoU dated 28.07.2025. 9.

The parties are present in the Court and have been identified by the IO. The parties submit that they have arrived at the settlement without any force, coercion and undue influence and pressure and they have signed the MoU dated 28.07.2025 with their wish and will. 10.

Learned Counsel for Petitioners submits that the parties have no grievance against each other, the present Petition be allowed and FIR No.0148/2025 be quashed.

11.

In view of MoU dated 28.07.2025, present Petition has been filed. 12.

Respondent No.2 is present and submits that she has no grievance against the Petitioners and also no objection to the quashing of FIR. 13.

In view of the fact that the FIR in question was premised upon a money dispute between the Petitioners and Respondent No.2, which has been amicably resolved in terms of MoU dated 28.07.2025. Considering the fact that Respondent No.2 has also given no objection to the quashing of FIR, no fruitful purpose would be served in continuing with the proceedings arising out of the FIR.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

14.

Consequently, FIR No.0148/2025 under Sections 74/76/79/351(2)/ 115(2)/3(5) BNS, 2023, registered at PS: Rohini, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

15.

The Petition along with pending Application is disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

SEPTEMBER 16, 2025/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.