Sajid & ORS. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6760/2025, CRL.M.A. 28457/2025 SAJID & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Petitioners in person with Counsel.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP.

Mr.

Saharul Alam Laskar and Ms. Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Advs.

for R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 22.09.2025 1.

Petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners for quashing of FIR No.0770/2017 under Sections 341/452/392/34 IPC, registered at PS: Jamia Nagar, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 27.08.2025. 2.

Issue Notice.

3.

Learned APP and learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 appearing on advance Notice, accept Notice.

4.

Affidavit-cum-No Objection dated 27.08.2025 given by Respondent No.2 is annexed with the Petition. Respondent No.2 is present in person and submits that Petitioners are known to him, who had come to his house and he had let them in voluntarily. Some altercation had taken place, but there were no threats extended to him, the amount of Rs.65,000/- was found in his house itself after 2-3 days of the incident; the alleged cheque, on which his The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

signatures were obtained forcibly, was also recovered from drawer of his house after few days.

5.

It is further submitted that on 21.12.2017, on Complaint of Respondent No. 2, FIR No.0770/2017 under Sections 341/452/392/34 IPC was registered at PS: Jamia Nagar, Delhi.

6.

It is submitted that present FIR was a consequence of the disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.2, who are known to each other. It is stated that with the intervention of family members, relatives and well wishers, the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled all the disputes and differences between them vide Settlement Agreement dated 27.08.2025.

7.

The parties are present in the Court and have been identified by the IO. The parties submit that they have arrived at the settlement without any force, coercion and undue influence and pressure and they have signed the Settlement Agreement dated 27.08.2025 with their wish and will. 8.

Learned Counsel for Petitioners submits that the parties have no grievance against each other. Since Respondent No. 2 has already made a statement before the Court that he does not want to pursue the proceedings in FIR, the present Petition be allowed and FIR No.0770/2017 be quashed. 9.

In view of Settlement Agreement dated 27.08.2025, present Petition has been filed.

10.

Respondent No.2 is present and submits that he has no grievance against the Petitioners and also no objection to the quashing of FIR. 11.

In view of the fact that the FIR in question was premised upon a dispute between the Petitioners and Respondent No.2, who are known to each other, which has been amicably resolved in terms of Settlement Agreement dated The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

27.08.2025. Considering the fact that Respondent No.2 has also given no objection to the quashing of FIR, no fruitful purpose would be served in continuing with the proceedings arising out of the FIR. 12.

Consequently, FIR No.0770/2017 under Sections 341/452/392/34 IPC, registered at PS: Jamia Nagar, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

13.

The Petition along with pending Application is disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

SEPTEMBER 22, 2025/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.