Amarjeet Singh And ANR. v. Union Of India And ANR

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2328/2018 with CM. APPL. 9688/2018 AMARJEET SINGH AND ANR.

..... Petitioner Through:

Appearance not given.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 22.03.2018 1.

This matter has come up for hearing on 15.03.2018 when an interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner giving liberty to the official respondents to file a counter affidavit. The counter affidavit has been filed. 2.

Broadly, the facts in the matter are as follows:-

(1) The petitioners were directors on a company by the name Parneet Electronics Pvt. Ltd. . The name of said company has been struck of from the register of companies.

(2) The petitioners‟ counsel, dehors other contentions, says that the petitioners wish to revive the company and therefore would like to take recourse to the provision of Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 and also avail the benefits of Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 (in short „Scheme‟).

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to approach the NCLT for revival.

4.

The petitioners will take requisite steps prior to 31.03.2018.

5.

In order to facilitate, the aforementioned exercise by the petitioners, the interim order passed on 15.03.2018 will continue to operate till 31.03.2018.

6.

The writ petition is disposed of.

7.

All the pending applications are disposed of. 8.

The interim direction will continue to operate till disposal of the appeal by the NCLT.

9.

Liberty is given to both the parties to move the court if a situation arises which requires variation of the order passed today. 10.

Needless to say, if the petitioner does not file an appeal or NCLT does not dispose of the appeal within one week from today, the interim order dated 15.3.2018 will stand vacated automatically. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J MARCH 22, 2018 c