Ram Chander Prasad v. Subhash & ANR.

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 222/2024, CM APPL. 19678/2024 (stay), CM APPL. 19679/2024 (delay) RAM CHANDER PRASAD .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Pankaj Agarwal and Mr. Chandan Kumar Mandal, Advocates.

versus SUBHASH & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Counsel for the Respondents (appearance not given)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 15.04.2026 Case is taken up today as 14.04.2026 was declared a Holiday on account of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Jayanti, in terms of Notification No.71/G4/Genl-I/DHC dated 10.04.2026. 1.

Vide Order dated 07.04.2026, both the parties were directed to appear in person.

2.

Learned counsel for the Appellant has appeared and at 04:30 p.m and states that he has been recently engaged. The Appellant is not present and shall appear on the next date of hearing. There is a clear negligence of the Order of this Court wherein the Appellant had been directed to appear in person.

3.

In the absence of the Appellant, the Appeal along with the Applications, is dismissed in default.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J APRIL 15, 2026/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 13:27:05