← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./966/2017

Suraj Gangwal @ Lekh Raj & ORS v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

2017-03-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~51 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 966/2017 SURAJ GANGWAL @ LEKH RAJ & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Bhagwan Singh, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with SI Naresh Kumar, PS-Uttam Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 08.03.2017 CRL.M.A.4028/2017 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 966/2017 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.309/2013, under Sections 341/325/308/34 IPC, registered at Police Station-Uttam Nagar, Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom. Counsel for the petitioners submits that presently the petitioners and the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are residents of same locality and due to some misunderstanding arisen between the parties, a quarrel had taken place resulting into registration of FIR No.309/2013, under Sections 341/325/308/34 IPC at Police Station-Uttam Nagar, Delhi. Counsel further submits that after the registration of the FIR, the near relatives and the friends intervened and the matter has been amicably settled between the parties vide compromise deed dated 08.02.2017 and nothing remains to be adjudicated further between them and to have better relationship in near

future, the present FIR, which is coming as a hurdle in their way, may be quashed.

Respondent No.2 Mr.Imran @ Bunti, respondent No.3 Mr.Azharuddin @ Golu and respondent No.4 Mr.Saif Mohd. are present in Court today and have been identified by the Investigating Officer SI Naresh Kumar, Police Station-Uttam Nagar, Delhi. The respondent Nos.2 to 4 admit that they have settled the matter amicably with the petitioners vide compromise deed dated 08.02.2017.

They further submit that the settlement/compromise has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion. They submit that nothing remains to be adjudicated further between them and they have no objection if the FIR in question is quashed.

Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties who are stated to be residents of same locality and nothing remains to be adjudicated further between them, to promote peace in the neighbourhood and for maintaining good relationship between the parties, I deem it appropriate to quash the FIR and all its subsequent proceedings. Consequently, FIR No.309/2013, under Sections 341/325/308/34 IPC, registered at Police Station-Uttam Nagar, Delhi and all proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. Parties to remain bound by the terms of settlement dated 08.02.2017. The present petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed. I.S.MEHTA, J MARCH 08, 2017/radhika