Junaid Javed v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~90, 100 & 101 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 8372/2024 JUNAID JAVED .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan and Mr. Rahul Rohatgi, Advs.
versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Ms Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State SI Anupam, PS Jama Masjid Mr. Mohd. Asif, Mr. Asif Malik, Ms.
Rajesh Wali, Advs. for R-2.
+ W.P.(CRL) 3316/2024 ADEEBA ASIF .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Mohd. Asif, Mr. Asif Malik, Ms.
Rajeshwari, Advs.
versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr Kshitiz Garg, Mr Ashvini Kumar and Ms Chavi Lazarus, Advs.
SI Abad Haider, PS Saket + W.P.(CRL) 3341/2024 JUNAID JAVED & ORS.
.....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan and Mr. Rahul Rohatgi, Advs.
versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through:
Mr Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State SI Pardeep Malik, PS-Jamia Nagar Mr. Mohd. Asif, Mr. Asif Malik, Ms.
Rajeshwari for R2, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R
% 11.11.2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
1. These are petitions seeking quashing of the following FIRs:- A.FIR bearing No. 0182 of 2022 under section 4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, PS Jama Masjid, Delhi, B.FIR No. 0500/2023 under Section 420/467/468 of IPC, PS Saket, South District, New Delhi, and C.FIR No. 0289 of 2021 under section 498A/406/34 of IPC registered at PS Jamia Nagar, South East Delhi.
2. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have arrived at a settlement dated 11.09.2024 before the Mediation Centre, Saket Court wherein all the cases have been settled and the complainant Ms. Adeeba Asif has to be paid Rs.6,50,000/- in all.
3. A sum of Rs. 4,50,000 was paid already and balance sum of Rs.2,00,000/- is paid today by way of Demand Draft.
4. The parties are already divorced as per Islamic Law.
5. Mr. Junaid Javed is present in Court and is identified by his counsel Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan and Mr. Rahul Rohatgi and Ms. Adeeba Asif is present in Court and identified by Mr. Mohd. Asif, Adv.
6. Since the parties have arrived at a settlement and no disputes are pending, I am convinced that quashing of such proceedings on account of compromise would bring peace and would secure ends of justice. The Court does not see any fruitful purpose if criminal proceedings are permitted to be prosecuted any further.
7. In this view of the matter, there is no reason to continue the proceedings. Hence, the aforesaid FIRs and the consequential The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
8. Ms. Adeeba Asif who is in present in Court today has been cautioned with regard to the sanctity of the judicial process and the importance and relevance of the documents filed in Court.
9. With these observations, the petitions are disposed of. JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024/sp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.