Jai Ram v. Union Of India & ANR

$~33 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1761/2015 JAI RAM ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Satnam Singh Bains and Ms Sneha Mukherjee, Advocates.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr Arun Bhardwaj and Mr Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocates for respondent with Mr Harwinder, Inspector.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 05.02.2019 1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the denial of visa to his wife. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that the visa has been denied to the petitioner's wife, as she was blacklisted. He submits that her name has now been removed from the said category and there would be no impediment for the petitioner to apply for a visa afresh.

2.

He further submits that if the petitioner's wife applies for an OCI card, her application shall be considered in accordance with law. 3.

The respondents are bound down to the said statement and the petition is disposed of.

4.

It is clarified that this Court has not examined the question whether

the action of the respondents in blacklisting the petitioner's wife was otherwise illegal or sustainable in law.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 05, 2019 MK