← Library
High Court of DelhiCONT.CAS(C)/1708/2024

Sonu Kumar & ORS. v. Union Of India & ORS.

2024-12-06Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Jain2 pages

$~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1708/2024 SONU KUMAR & ORS.

.....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mandeep Baisala with Mr.

Rakchit Mishra, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr.

Himanshu Bidhuri, GP and Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Advocates along with DC Devesh Tripathi and AC Shivankat, CISF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

O R D E R

% 06.12.2024 1.

There are seven petitioners in the present petition. 2.

They seek initiation of contempt proceedings against respondents for not complying with the directions contained in order dated 13.09.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 12897/2024 3.

Mr. Amit Tiwari, learned CGSC, on instructions, submits that as far as petitioner No. 1-Mr. Sonu Kumar S/o Mr. Dinesh Mahto and petitioner No. 7-Mr. Bhupesh Singh S/o Mr. Paras Singh are concerned, they have already been found suitable and requisite communication has already been sent to them.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners also does not dispute the same. CONT.CAS(C) 1708/2024 1 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 12:54:18

5.

With respect to the rest of the petitioners i.e. petitioner No. 2-Mr. Amit Kumar, petitioner No. 3- Mr. Vishvajeet Pandey, petitioner No.4-Mr. Anand Kumar, petitioner No. 5-Mr. Amit Mandal and petitioner No. 6-Mr. Bibekananda Das, the matter has already been re-examined by the concerned Standing Screening Committee on 4th instant and after having necessary approval from the concerned Authorities, the communication would be sent to those petitioners, within three weeks from today. 6.

Such statement is taken on record.

7.

In view of the above, learned counsel for petitioners submits that, at the moment, he does not press the present contempt petition. He, however, submits that if nothing is communicated, as undertaken above, he may be permitted to revive the present contempt petition. 8.

The petition stands disposed of, accordingly. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

MANOJ JAIN, J DECEMBER 6, 2024/sw CONT.CAS(C) 1708/2024 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 12:54:18