Rajesh Kumari v. D.S.S.S.B. & ANR

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9781/2006 RAJESH KUMARI .....Petitioner Through:

None versus D.S.S.S.B. & ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr.

Arjun Mahajan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Ravikant Kumar, Advocate for MCD

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 16.05.2026 1.

The Court Notice was issued to the Petitioner and it was reported that no such person resides at the given address.

2.

The prayer in the Writ Petition was to challenge the action of the Respondents and not appointing the Petitioner to the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) in terms of Advertisement dated 11.12.2000 and to so appoint the Petitioner.

3.

Considering that the Petitioner was seeking an appointment pursuant to Advertisement dated 11.12.2000, the relief essentially has become infructuous.

4.

None is appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. 5.

The Petition along with pending Application, if any, stands dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MAY 16, 2026 N The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 16:06:24