Sunil Kumar Bansal & ORS. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7031/2025, CRL.M.A. 29517/2025 SUNIL KUMAR BANSAL & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Appearance not given.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State with SI Vijay.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 11.11.2025 1.

A Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No.0684/2024 under Section 498A/406/34 IPC dated 24.12.2024 registered at Police Station Mahendra Park, Delhi. 2.

Brief facts of the case are that the marriage was solemnized between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 on 22.06.2023 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. It is stated that no child was born out of the said wedlock. Due to the temperamental issues between the parties, they started residing separately.

3.

It is further submitted that on 24.12.2024, on the complaint of respondent No. 2, an FIR bearing No. 0684/2024 under Sections The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 got registered at Police Station Mahendra Park.

4.

It is stated that with the intervention of the family and friends of the Parties, they amicably settled all the disputes and differences before vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 31.05.2025, and it was inter alia settled between the parties that the respondent No. 2/wife and the petitioner No. 1/husband shall dissolve their marriage by decree of mutual consent. 5.

It is also stated that on 20.08.2025, the marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 had been dissolved as per Hindu law. 6.

In view of the Compromise Deed dated 31.05.2025, the present petition has been filed.

7.

The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. The parties have endorsed the amicable settlement and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily.

8.

The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Memorandum of Settlement dated 31.05.2025 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR. 9.

The present petition has been signed by all the parties and is supported by their respective affidavits. The parties have reaffirmed the terms of the settlement arrived at vide MOU dated 31.05.2025 and they also submit that the said MOU has been arrived at between the parties without any pressure and coercion.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

10.

Today, the complainant/respondent No. 2/wife, who is present in Court, states that she has No Objection if the FIR is quashed. 11.

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a family matter, I am of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

12.

Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

13.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 0684/2024 registered at Police Station Mahendra Park, for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed qua all the Petitioners herein. 14.

The petition stands disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 11, 2025/va The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.