Richa Wadhwa @ Rama @ Swety & ANR v. Bunty

$~57 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 363/2017 RICHA WADHWA @ RAMA @ SWETY & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Niraj Chaudhary, Adv. with Mr.A.S. Sharma, Adv.

versus BUNTY ..... Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 18.05.2017 Crl. M.A. 8246/2017 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the petition is condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

Crl. M.A. 8245/2017 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

Crl. Rev. P. 363/2017 & Crl. M.A. 8244/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that insufficient maintenance allowance has been ordered by the Trial Court, however without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties the petitioner prefers to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all his issues before the Trial Court in a time frame manner, preferably within six months

time.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly, with the direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the maintenance petition within six months as far as possible from receipt of copy of this order. A copy of this order be sent to the Trial Court for compliance. A copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed. I.S.MEHTA, J MAY 18, 2017/km