Gulab Anjani Choudhari Industrial Trainging Centre v. Directorate General Of Training & ANR
$~38 to 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1766/2017 GULAB ANJANI CHOUDHARI INDUSTRIAL TRAINGING CENTRE ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr.
Ashok Kumar, Advs.
versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr.
Farman Ali, Adv.
Ms. Meera Bhatia, Adv.
+ W.P.(C) 1768/2017 GIRDHARI CHOUDHARI INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr.
Ashok Kumar, Advs.
versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr.
Farman Ali, Adv.
Ms. Meera Bhatia, Adv.
+ W.P.(C) 1989/2017 VINDHAYANCHAL PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr.
Ashok Kumar, Advs.
versus 1/3
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR.... Respondents Through Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr.
Farman Ali, Adv.
Ms. Meera Bhatia, Adv.
+ W.P.(C) 2221/2017 JAGDAMBA PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr.
Ashok Kumar, Advs.
versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr.
Farman Ali, Adv.
Ms. Meera Bhatia, Adv.
+ W.P.(C) 2223/2017 NEW LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr.
Ashok Kumar, Advs.
versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr.
Farman Ali, Adv.
Ms. Meera Bhatia, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
% 06.02.2020 CRL.M.A. 21412/2017 in W.P.(C) 1766/2017 CRL.M.A. 21476/2017 in W.P.(C) 1768/2017 CRL.M.A. 21475/2017 in W.P.(C) 1989/2017 2/3
CRL.M.A. 47204/2017 in W.P.(C) 2221/2017 CRL.M.A. 47275/2017 in W.P.(C) 2223/2017 1.
Mr. Farman Ali, who appears for the applicants/original respondents says that the captioned applications are not pressed. 2.
Mr. Farman Ali says that pursuant to an inspection carried out, affiliation has been granted to the petitioners in the accompanying writ petitions.
3.
Accordingly, the captioned applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY 06, 2020 rb 3/3