← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/15381/2025

Raeks Estates Developers Pvt Ltd v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi

2025-11-04Cases Pertaining To Spl.Division Benches2 pages

$~7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 15381/2025 CM APPL. 63043/2025 RAEKS ESTATES DEVELOPERS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Kavita Jha, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr. Aditya Bali, Advs.

versus NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC, Mr. Anant Mann, Mr. P. Gupta, JSCs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

O R D E R

% 04.11.2025 1.

This petition has been filed with the following prayers : "a) quashing the order dated 19.09.2025 passed under section 250 of the Act by Respondent in Petitioner's case for the assessment year 2017-18; and b) to Respondent granting personal hearing to the Petitioner and pass a fresh order under Section 250 of the Act;" 2.

The challenge is primarily to an order dated 19.09.2025 under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). One of the submissions of Ms. Kavita Jha, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that while passing the order dated 19.09.2025, personal hearing was not given to the petitioner, despite a request having been made by the petitioner. 3.

On the last date of hearing, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel for respondent/Revenue sought time to take instructions. As per his instructions, though the hearing was not given to the petitioner, but the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/11/2025 at 15:59:18

submissions as filed by the petitioner, having been considered and a reasoned order passed, the same would suffice the requirement of personal hearing.

4.

We are not in agreement with this submission of Mr. Bhatia. Appropriate shall be that the petitioner be given an opportunity of hearing by the Commissioner (Appeals) who thereafter shall pass a reasoned order. 5.

Accordingly, we set aside the order dated 19.09.2025 passed under Section 250 of the Act, directing the CIT(A) to inform the date and time in writing to enable the representative of the petitioner appear virtually before him to advance the arguments.

6.

The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within eight weeks from today as an outer limit.

7.

The petition and the pending application are disposed of. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MADHU JAIN, J NOVEMBER 04, 2025 ss The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/11/2025 at 15:59:18