Sachin Meena v. Central Vigilance Commission & ORS.

$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15403/2024 SACHIN MEENA .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal.

Advocates for R-1.

Mr. Manu Chaturvedi adv Standing Counsel for MCD

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 20.04.2026 1.

None is present on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being called out in second round.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents' point out that the petitioner has expired.

3.

There is no application filed on behalf of the legal heirs of the petitioner. In view thereof, the proceedings stands abated. 4.

Liberty is, however, granted to the legal heirs of the petitioner to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 20, 2026 Nc The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 12:58:47