Br Biomedical Private Limited v. Union Of India

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1747/2024 BR BIOMEDICAL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Jaitegan Singh Khurana, Mr .J.

Rajesh, Mr. Md. Arsalan, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:

Mr. R. V. Prabhat, SPC with Mr.

Kapil Dev Yadav, Govt Pleader Mr R Venkat Prabhat, SPC, Mr Abhinav Mohan Goel Advocates for R-1 & R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 14.11.2024 1.

The Petitioner has approached this Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. 2.

It is stated that RVC Centre and College issued tender for procurement of equipment for modernisation of Surgical Trg Facilities (Canine Surgical Training Manikin). It is stated that pursuant to the technical bid, the Respondent issued a supply order to the bid offered by the Petitioner.

3.

It is stated that since disputes has arisen between the parties under the supply order, the Petitioner issued notice dated 05.09.2024 invoking The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2024 at 12:58:51

arbitration under Clause 3 of Part III of the supply order. 4.

During the course of hearing, respective Counsel for the parties jointly request that an independent Sole Arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

5.

Accordingly, Ms. Mishika Bajpai, Adv. (Mob. No.9811840277) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.

6.

The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fee under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. 7.

The learned Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 within a week of entering on reference.

8.

All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.

9.

Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the contentions of the parties. 10.

The present petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application(s), if any.

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024 hsk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2024 at 12:58:51