← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./8773/2024

Manjeet Kumar & ANR. v. State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

2024-11-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri3 pages

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8773/2024, CRL.M.A. 33564/2024, CRL.M.A. 33565/2024 and CRL.M.A. 33580/2024 MANJEET KUMAR & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through: Mr.Sunil Kumar Chaturvedi, Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Nisha Sharma Mr.Akash Bassi, Advocate for respondent No.2 and the injuredwith respondent No.2 and the injured in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 08.11.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.329/2020 registered under Sections 308/34 IPC at P.S. Govind Puri, New Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners gave beatings to the complainant and her son.

3.

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case, the petitioners are the accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim. He further submits that besides respondent No.2, there The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

is also another injured namely, Rajiv Kumar, who is also present in the Court today and the chargesheet in the present case has been filed. 4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement before Mediation Cenrtre, Saket Court, New Delhi on 17.10.2022 and in terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 as well as the injured/Rajiv Kumar do not wish to pursue any legal action against the present petitioners herein and is now left with no claims or grievances whatsoever against the present petitioners.

5.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the injured/Rajiv Kumar, who are present in Court, have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer. 6.

The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 and the injured/Rajiv Kumar state that they have entered into the aforesaid mediation settlement with the present petitioners out of their own free will, volition and without any coercion. They further state that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed against the present petitioners. 7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- by each petitioner to be paid to respondent No.2 within a period of four weeks from today. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

10.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. In case the receipt of payment of cost is not filed within the stipulated time, the I.O. shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application. 11.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith the pending applications.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J NOVEMBER 8, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.