Yogesh Attray v. State

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 332/2014 YOGESH ATTRAY ..... Petitioner Through None versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr Ashok Kumar Garg, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State Mr Nishant Rani and Mr Puneet Singh Dhar, Advs. for complainant alongwith complainant

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 28.04.2016 Crl. MA 1355/2016 (restoration) and Crl. MA 1357/2016 (delay) Despite passing over the matter twice, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. As such, the applications are dismissed in default as well as for non-prosecution. SUNITA GUPTA, J APRIL 28, 2016/rd At this stage, Mr Vaibhav Sharma, counsel for the petitioner appears and submits that he wants to withdraw both the applications The submissions of counsel for the petitioner have been noted. However, since the applications have already been dismissed in default, no order is required to be passed. SUNITA GUPTA, J APRIL 28, 2016/rd