Kailash Ram v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~13 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3096/2018 with CM Nos.12334/2018 and 12335/2018 KAILASH RAM ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Rajiv Ranjan Pandey, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 24.03.2018 1.

Counsels are agreed that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the order dated 22.3.2018 passed in various writ petitions including W.P.(C) No.2472/2018, titled: Puja Tandon and Anr. vs. Registrar of Companies and Ors. In sum, the petitioner seeks to revive the subject company by filing an appeal before the NCLT under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner says that qua the subject company i.e., Reckon Power Industries Limited, he seeks application of the directives contained in the aforementioned order, insofar as it concerns the petitioner.

3.

Issue notice.

4.

Mr. Bhardwaj accepts on behalf of official respondents. Counsels submit that in view of various orders passed by this Court in matters which are pari materia this writ petition be disposed of in line with the aforesaid order.

W.P.(C) No.3096/2018

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the official respondents to apply the directives contained in order dated 22.03.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No.2472/2018, titled: Puja Tandon and Anr. vs. Registrar of Companies and Ors.

6.

It is made clear that the directions contained in aforementioned order will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner(s) herein. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J MARCH 24, 2018 vikas W.P.(C) No.3096/2018