Shri Varun Nagpal v. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ORS.

$~93 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 15690/2025 & CM APPL. 64171/2025 SHRI VARUN NAGPAL .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Gaurav Nagpal, Adv.

Mob: 8447430497 Email:

gauravnagpal2304@gmail.com versus THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms.

Cauveri Birbal, (ASG), Mr.

Kamlendu Pandey, Ms. Nishtha Dhall and Ms. Preksha Gaur, Advs. for R-1 & 2 Mob: 9810017683 Email: cauveribirbal@gmail.com Mr. Akhil Mittal, ASC-DDA with Ms. Riddhi Jain, Adv. for R-DDA Mob: 9212504099 Email: mittalsolicitors@gmail.com Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, Senior Panel Counsel for R-3 Mob: 9717736267 Email: tanveer350@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 13.10.2025 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent no. 1 to 4, to restrain respondent no. 5 from carrying out any illegal and unauthorized construction, and encroachment in property bearing The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:24:42

No. D-50, Gali No. 6, Mohan Garden, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059. 2.

Responding to the present writ petition, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1-Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), submits that the ground floor and third floor of the property in question, has been sealed on 29th September, 2025.

3.

At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is satisfied with the action taken by the MCD and does not want to press the present writ petition any further. 4.

In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1-MCD submits that the petitioner does not stay on the same street as the property where unauthorized construction is stated to have taken place. She, thus, submits that the petitioner is not affected by the construction in question and that the present writ petition would not be maintainable. 5.

The aforesaid statement made by learned counsel appearing for the MCD is noted.

6.

However, since, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition on the first date itself, the present writ petition, along with the pending application is accordingly dismissed, as withdrawn. MINI PUSHKARNA, J OCTOBER 13, 2025/SK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:24:42