Rahul Solanki v. Central Reserve Police Force & ORS.

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15636/2024 RAHUL SOLANKI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Anshul Kumar, Mr. Bhanu Pratap, Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Manish Mishra, Advs.

versus CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Hussain Taqvi, Mr. Yogya Bhatia and Ms. Ranjana Jetley, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 11.11.2024 CM APPL. 65595/2024-Exp.

1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 15636/2024 3.

By the present petition, the petitioner prays for directions to the respondents to grant the Travelling Allowance (TA)/Dearness Allowance (DA) and Mileage Allowance (MA) to the petitioner, or for the petitioner to be provided with a Government vehicle for his daily commute between the Group Centre, Greater Noida to the Group Centre, Sonipat, as per Service Regulations. The petitioner prays that The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:26:12

such allowances be paid to him with effect from the date of his attachment to the Group Centre, Sonipat, that is, from 18.06.2024. 4.

We are of the opinion that the present petition should be considered as a representation of the petitioner by the respondents and should be decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order thereon, within a period of eight weeks from today. The decision on the representation be communicated to the petitioner. 5.

In case the request of the petitioner is accepted, the arrears of the allowance should be paid to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter. In case the representation of the petitioner is rejected by the respondents, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with the law.

6.

We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner and the same shall be decided by the respondents in accordance with the law and the Service Regulations.

7.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024/ss/sk/SJ Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:26:12