Shahid Eqwal v. Union Of India & ORS

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1606/2015 SHAHID EQWAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Zeyal Haque Ali, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Santosh Kohli, Central Government Standing Counsel & Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for respondents No. 1 & 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 19.02.2016 1.

Pleadings are complete.

2.

After addressing arguments at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of the petitioner to submit a substantive representation to the competent authority for favourably considering the petitioner's request for discharge from service. 3.

This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with leave granted, as prayed for.

4.

It is made clear that we have not made any observations on the merits of the present case and it has been left open to the W.P.(C) 1606/2015

respondents to consider the same and pass a speaking order on the basis of petitioner's representation within four weeks from the date of receipt thereof, under written intimation to him. HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J FEBRUARY 19, 2016 r W.P.(C) 1606/2015