Ram Lal Yadav & ANR v. Master Ranjeet Kumar Minor & ORS

$--6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ FAO 239/2012 & C.M.18729/2014 RAM LAL YADAV & ANR Appellants Through: Nemo versus MASTER RANJEET KUMAR MINOR & ORS Respondents Through:

Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

ORDER

% 14.09.2016 Since IS"^ September, 2016 was declared a holiday, therefore, this tE matter is being taken up today i.e. on 14 September, 2016. Learned counsel for contesting respondents No. 1 to 3 submits that this appeal is liable to be dismissed on the ground that appellant No.lRam Lai Yadav had expired in August, 20,15 and his legal heirs have not been brought on record.

It is pointed out that on the ground of concealment of the fact that this property has been sold by appellant No.l to third party, this appeal deserves to be dismissed.

Since none appears on behalf of appellant even on the second call, therefore, this appeal and the application are dismissed in default. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 s - I By:AMULYA