Satish Chand Jain v. C B I

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 653/2013 SATISH CHAND JAIN ..... Appellant Through :

Mr.P.Singh with Mr.Mayank Jain and Ms.Madhu Jain, Advocate.

versus C B I ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 26.04.2017 Crl.M.A.3632/2017 1.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the abatement application (Crl.M.A.3631/2017) is condoned. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

Crl.M.A.3631/2017 1.

It is informed that the appellant has expired on 21.9.2016. No legal heirs of the appellant have come forward to pursue the appeal. 2.

The application is allowed.

CRL.A. 653/2013 1.

In view of the order passed above, the appeal stands disposed of as 'abated'.

2.

Surety bonds are discharged.

S.P.GARG, J.

APRIL 26, 2017/sa