Vijaya Bank v. N M Jain

$~173 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 112/2018 10053-10055/2018 VIJAYA BANK ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Jagat Arora, Advocate with Mr.

Rajat Arora, Advocate versus N M JAIN ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Advocate Mr. N.M. Jain, respondent in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 16.03.2018 CAV 211/2018 Mr. Ashok Bhalla, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the caveator/respondent.

The caveat is accordingly discharged.

CM 10055/2018 (Exemption) Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of accordingly.

LPA 112/2018

LPA 112/2018, CM 10053/2018 (Stay) & CM 10054/2018 (Condonation of Delay) After some arguments, Mr. Jagat Arora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant bank, limits the relief in the present appeal to a direction to permit them to make the payment of the consequential benefits that the respondent would be entitled to, after adjusting the amounts that would be recoverable from him, in view of the infliction of minor penalty for minor misconduct, as directed in the impugned order. Notice.

Mr. Ashok Bhalla, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and on instructions from the latter states that they do not oppose the limited relief prayed for on behalf of the appellant bank. Directed accordingly.

With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of. The pending applications also stand disposed of.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J VINOD GOEL, J MARCH 16, 2018 dn LPA 112/2018