← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/991/2014

Manish Kumar Upadhayay v. State & ANR

2016-05-31Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog1 pages

$~35 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 991/2014 MANISH KUMAR UPADHAYAY ..... Petitioner Represented by:

None.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel SI Sachin, PS Vasant Vihar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

O R D E R

% 31.05.2016 1.

Externment order, having validity of six months, has been challenged in the writ petition. No stay being granted the order has worked itself out. 2.

The petitioner can press the petition on the merits of the matter dehors the consequences of the order having worked itself out, but since none appears for the petitioner at the hearing today I dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution.

3.

No costs.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

MAY 31, 2016 rk