Vineet Goel v. Rushmi Goel

$~46 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ C.R.P. 333/2024, CM APPL. 66545/2024 (stay) VINEET GOEL .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mahindra Dubey, Advocate.

versus RUSHMI GOEL .....Respondent Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 14.11.2024 CM APPL.66546/2024 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The Application stands disposed of.

C.R.P. 333/2024 3.

The Revision Petition under Section 115 read with Section 151 the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ('CPC' hereinafter), has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for setting aside the Order dated 25.09.2024 with the prayer that the Petitioner be allowed to lead the evidence on the basis of the documents filed and already taken on record vide Order dated 27.07.2016. 4.

Briefly stated, the Petitioner had moved an Application under Order 18 read with Section 151 CPC. He was directed to file the detailed list of documents, which were filed vide Order dated 19.03.2015 and which was rejected vide Order dated 22.12.2021.What emerges from the record is, that the Plaintiff had been permitted to file certain documents vide Order dated The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2024 at 13:03:28

19.03.2015, which got filed on 27.07.2016.

Thereafter, he moved subsequent Application for taking on record the documents in the year 2019, which was dismissed vide Order dated 22.12.2021 and the Order was upheld by this Court vide Order dated 03.06.2022. The only grievance being agitated on behalf of the Revisionist/Plaintiff is that those documents, which were taken on record vide Order dated 27.07.2016, may be permitted to be proved, in accordance with law. The Order is absolutely clear that it only the documents, which were filed subsequently in 2019, that cannot be permitted to be taken on record.

5.

With these observations, the Plaintiff is at liberty to prove the documents permitted to be taken on record vide Order dated 16.09.2019, by way of evidence.

6.

There is no merit in the present Revision Petition, which is hereby dismissed.

7.

The Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly along with the pending Application.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2024 at 13:03:28