Chhaitanya Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. And ANR. & ANR. v. Mekala Chaitanya Prasad

$~126 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1795/2024 & CM APPL. 66412-66413/2024 CHHAITANYA DIAGNOSTICS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. & ANR. .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Varun Tyagi with Mr. Bharat Gupta, Ms. Akshita Harjai and Mr. Saurabh Khanijan, Advocates.

versus MEKALA CHAITANYA PRASAD .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Anni Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

O R D E R

% 22.11.2024 1.

Petitioners are seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for wilful disobedience of the directions contained in order dated 27.09.2024 passed by learned coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 13646/2024.

2.

The above said order records a direction to respondent No.1 to take a final view on the show-cause notice, in light of the response dated 21.08.2024 submitted by the petitioners within a period of four weeks from such order.

3.

It is contended that the above said period has already expired and there is no decision/final view on the above said show-cause notice in terms of the specific directions given by learned Coordinate Bench. 4.

Learned counsel for the respondent appears on advance notice and submits that though all the related aspects have already been taken CONT.CAS(C) 1795/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2024 at 12:14:31

care of while they had issued an order dated 18.09.2024 but, in all fairness, learned counsel for the respondent also admits that subsequent to the above said order dated 27.09.2024, there is no further order. 5.

On instructions, it is undertaken by learned counsel for the respondents that the above said directions shall be complied within three weeks from today.

6.

Such assurance is taken on record.

7.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that, at the moment, he does not press his present petition but in case the representation is not decided within the above said period of three weeks, he may be given liberty to revive the present petition. 8.

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

MANOJ JAIN, J NOVEMBER 22, 2024 st CONT.CAS(C) 1795/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2024 at 12:14:31