Raj Kumar Malhotra & ANR v. Samar Qureshi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 228/2016 RAJ KUMAR MALHOTRA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate with Ms. Saakshi Agrawal and Mr. Falit Kaushik, Advocates with petitioner No.1 in person.

versus SAMAR QURESHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Advocate with respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 05.05.2017 In lieu of the outstanding rent, learned counsel for respondent has handed over the following Demand Pay Orders to learned counsel for petitioners:- S.No.

Demand Pay Order No.

Dated Amount Drawn On 012237 in favour of Ms. Neeru Malhotra 04.05.2017 Rs.1,66,664/- E-29, IDBI Bank, Main PVR Road, New Delhi.

2.

012238 of Mr.

Raj Kumar Malhotra 05.05.2017 Rs.5,00,000/- E-29, IDBI Bank, Main PVR Road, New Delhi.

Learned counsel for respondent, on instructions of respondent, who is personally present assures and undertakes to this Court that Rs.5,54,839/-, being outstanding TDS, shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of four months from today.

Learned counsel for respondent further assures and undertakes to this Court that interest and/or penalty levied, if any, by the Income Tax Department shall be borne by the respondent.

The statements/undertakings given by the respondent are accepted by this Court and respondent is held bound by the same. Recording the aforesaid undertakings, present contempt petition is closed.

However, list the matter for compliance on 25th September, 2017. MANMOHAN, J MAY 05, 2017 js