Cit v. Hopwin Admark & Consultancy Services Pvt Ltd

$~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 471/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Std. Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Std.

Counsel with Mr. Dushyant Sarna, Advocate.

versus HOPWIN ADMARK & CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 28.02.2019 It is submitted by learned counsel for the Revenue that this appeal is below the tax limit prescribed by the notification/ circular dated 11.07.2018. Consequently, it is dismissed for low tax effect. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 28, 2019 'pv'