Surabhi Kaushik v. Ramnik Chadha

$~54 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 376/2024, CM APPL. 67295/2024 SURABHI KAUSHIK .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Praveen Kumar, Mr.

Fardeen Khan, Ms. Aashna Bola, Mr. Suman Raj, Advs.

versus RAMNIK CHADHA .....Respondent Through:

Dr Amit George, Mr. Rishabh Dheer, Ms. Aishwarya Singh, Ms Medhavi Bhatia, Mr.

Prateek Srivastava, Mr. Sarthak Bhardwaj, Ms. Rupam Jha, Mr.

Adhishwar Suri, Advs

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 22.09.2025 1.

On the basis of the Settlement Agreement executed between the parties on 19.02.2021, the marriage between the parties was dissolved and it was agreed between the parties that the Respondent (Father of two children of the parties) would bear the educational expenses of the two children. The elder son of the parties, namely Mr. Akshat Chadha, is now of 27 years of age and is stated to have completed his education, whereas the younger son, namely Mr. Shiv Chadha, is of 20 years of age and is stated to be studying at University of San Francisco, California, United States.

2.

An application was filed before the Family Court for payment towards educational expenses of Mr. Shiv Chadha, which was dismissed by the Family Court on the ground that Mr. Shiv Chadha was studying at University of San Francisco, California, United States The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:57:18

without the consent of the Respondent-father. It is now stated that Mr. Shiv Chadha has completed two and a half years of study. 3.

During the course of the arguments, learned counsel representing the parties, on instructions, submit that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. Learned counsel submit that it is agreed between the parties that the Respondent-father will pay the tuition fee and other expenses, including accommodation of Mr. Shiv Chadha at the rate of Rs.2,00,000/- per month. The Respondent is also stated to have already paid Rs.22,81,000/-. It is further submitted that it is also agreed between the parties that the remaining amount of Rs.37,19,000/- will be paid by the Respondent-father to Mr. Shiv Chadha within a period of eight weeks.

4.

It is also agreed between the parties that the Respondent-father will continue to pay to Mr. Shiv Chadha a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- per month till he completes his education, which is likely to be completed within next six to eighteen months.

5.

Learned counsel representing the parties submit that the aforestated payment is being made without prejudice to the rights of both parties under the Settlement Agreement.

6.

Learned counsel representing the Respondent submits that without prejudice, that no future expenditure shall be foisted upon the Respondent-father without his consent as a fait accompli. 7.

With these observations, the present Appeal is disposed of. The pending application stands closed.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

SEPTEMBER 22, 2025/jai/rgk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:57:18