Luder Mani & ORS v. Union Of India & ORS

$~15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 2089/2016 LUDER MANI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by:

Mr.Pawan Reley, Advocate with Mr.Vinod Sharma, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, Advocate with Ms.Priti, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 28.07.2016 1.

Three Central Para-Military Forces have been impleaded as a respondent.

The petitioners who are seven in number had worked under different Para-Military Forces.

Individual facts give birth to individual cause of action and we find no commonality of interest or cause of action emerging.

2.

Faced with aforesaid learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with right reserved to file fresh writ petitions but not by al petitioners acting together. The petitioners would file separate writ petitions inasmuch as individual facts give birth to different causes of action in favour of the petitioners concerning the ACP scheme emerge. WP(C) 2089/2016

3.

Granting liberty as prayed for on the terms above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

4.

No costs.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

JULY 28, 2016 skb WP(C) 2089/2016