Hari Shankar Kumar v. State

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 776/2016 HARI SHANKAR KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate with Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Aditya Swarup Agarwal, Proxy counsel.

ASI Tej Ram.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 08.04.2016 1.

The instant writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 26.02.2016 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `20,000/-. The same was reduced to RI for eight years in Crl.A.36/2013 by this Court on 09.10.2015. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone four years, six months and twenty-six days incarceration besides remission for ten months as on 26.02.2016. It further reveals that he is not involved in W.P.(CRL) 776/2016

any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. He has not availed any interim bail or parole during his detention.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of release, on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J APRIL 08, 2016 / tr W.P.(CRL) 776/2016