Dr Yash Jain v. The National Board Of Examinations In Medical Sciences & ORS.
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 1134/2024 DR YASH JAIN .....Appellant Through:
Mr. M.V. Mukunda, Adv.
versus THE NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Ms. Monica Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Ms.
Radhika Kurdukar, Advs. for UOI.
Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Malik Khurana, Mr.
Waize Ali Noor, Advs.
Mr. T Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravorty, Ms Yamini Singh, Advs. for NMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R
% 20.11.2024 CM APPL. 67378/2024 (Ex.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of.
LPA 1134/2024 1.
The appellant is aggrieved by the judgement rendered by the learned Single Judge dated 14 October 2024 in terms of which its writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has come to be dismissed with it being observed that this Court would lack territorial jurisdiction.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:26:30
2.
The issue which was sought to be canvassed in the writ petition itself pertained to the reliefs claimed against the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences, the first respondent, and the prayer for the allotment of an alternate seat in any other institution to the writ petitioner/appellant. The appellant was constrained to approach this Court since the fourth respondent, Darbhanga Medical College in which he had been accorded admission, had come to be de-accredited. 3.
The learned Single Judge proceeded to dismiss the writ petition following a judgment rendered by the Court in Shri Siddhi Vinayak Medical College & Hospital vs. Union of India1 and on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.
4.
Before us, however, learned counsels for parties are ad idem that that in light of the jurisdiction clause which applied to the examination and admission process, the writ petition was clearly maintainable before this Court. In view of the aforesaid and the undisputed position which emerges from the record, we find ourselves unable to sustain the view as expressed.
5.
The appeal shall stand allowed. The impugned judgment dated 14 October 2024 shall consequently stand set aside. 6.
The writ petition shall stand revived to be placed before the board of the appropriate Roster Bench on 16.12.2024. YASHWANT VARMA, J.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
NOVEMBER 20, 2024/neha 1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7230 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:26:30