Jabid @ Javed v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 9092/2024 and CRL.M.A. 34851/2024 JABID @ JAVED .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Aamer Ahmed Madni, Advocate with petitioner in person versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP for State with SI Gita Respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 21.11.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.917/2014 registered under Sections 354A/506/509 IPC at P.S. Mehrauli, New Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioner slapped respondent No.2, abused and threatened her, causing her mental distress. 3.

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case, the petitioner is the only accused and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim. He further submits that considering the serious nature of the averments/allegations against the petitioner and since the State machinery has already been put in motion, the petitioner be saddled with some costs.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present FIR was registered due to a misunderstanding between the parties and that, with the intervention of family and well-wishers, the parties have amicably settled The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

their disputes and have entered into a settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.10.2024. In terms of the said settlement, respondent No.2 is now left with no claims or grievances whatsoever against the petitioner.

5.

The petitioner, who is present in Court, has been identified by his counsel as well as by the concerned Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2, who is also present in Court, has also been identified by the Investigating Officer.

6.

The petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct and he undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to the payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- by the petitioner to be paid to respondent No.2 by way of a demand draft through the concerned I.O. within a period of four weeks from today. 10.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. In case the receipt of payment of cost is not filed within the stipulated time, the I.O. shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

11.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J NOVEMBER 21, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.