Raju v. Parmila Sharma

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 337/2024, CM APPL. 67676/2024 RAJU .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Yash Gautam and Mr. Himanshu Aulluck, Advocates.

versus PARMILA SHARMA .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Prakhar Sharma, Ms. Yashima Sharma and Mr.

Raja Sharma, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 18.03.2025 1.

After some submissions, learned counsels for parties pray that matter be remanded back to the Ld. ARC for fresh consideration of leave to defend application on merits.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, also submits that without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner concerning the claim of ownership, the petitioner would pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- per month to the respondent alongwith arrears within a period of one month from today. 3.

In view of the above, subject to petitioner clearing arrears of rent within the undertaken period, and with the consent of the parties, the matter is remanded back to the concerned ARC for fresh consideration of leave to The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/03/2025 at 17:45:59

defend application on merits.

4.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of alongwith pending application.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 18, 2025 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/03/2025 at 17:45:59