Vinod Kumar & ORS v. The State & ORS

$-25 &

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL.M.C. 784/2015 + VINOD KUMAR & QRS Petitioners Mr.Amit Rao, Adv. along with petitioners in person.

Through versus THE STATE & QRS Respondents Ms.Jasbir Kaur, AFP for the State along with SI Yogesh.

Mr.Naresh Gambhir, Adv. for R-2 to 5 along with respondents No.2 to 5 in Through person.

CRL.M.C. 921/2015 + RAJBIR SINGH & QRS Through Petitioners Mr.Naresh Gambhir, Adv. along with petitioners in person.

versus .;... Respondents Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Yogesh.

Mr.Amit Rao, Adv. for R-2 to 6 along with respondents No.2 to 6 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH THE STATE & ORS Through

ORDER

% 07.05.2015 Parties are present in Court who have been identified by their respective counsel.

By:AMULYA

These are two petitions filed by the petitioners under Section 482 308/323/3rvrTp TM S-'-- 323/325/34 IPG and 85/2013 Sections 308/323/34 IPG, registered at Police Station Timar Pur, Delhi.

Brief facts of the case are that the parties are relatives and on M" April, 2013 a quarrel took place between them in which both the sides suffered injuries. On the basis of the complaints made by Vinod Kumar (respondent No.2 in Grl. M.G. No.921/2015), the FIR No.84/2013 was registered against petitioners, namely, Rajbir Singh, Kiran Pal, Braham Pal and Jagvinder Singh.

Kiran Pal (respondent No.2 in Crl. M.C.

No.784/2015) also made a complaint in respect of the same incident, on the basis of which the FIR No.85/2013 was registered against the petitioners, namely, Vinod Kumar, Dhirender Singh @ Dhiru, Baljeet, Mahender and Gyan Chand.

Since the parties are relatives, they have settled their disputes before Medaition Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, on 15*^ December, 2014. Copy of the Settlement/Agreement dated 15^^ December, 2014 is placed on record. They are also present in Court and have confirmed the settlement. Learned APP for the State has informed the Court that one of the victims, namely, Vishant, is not impleaded as a party in the present proceedings, though his name is mentioned in the FIR. Petitioners under these circumstances indemnify that in case Vishant has got any grievance about quashing of FIR, he would be entitled to initiate the proceedings in accordance with law.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in order to maintain peace and harmony between the parties and in view of the

308/323/325/14 TPP N«^-84/20I3 under Sections Sections 308/323/34 IPC, registered at Ohce Staton Ttoar Pur, Delhi, and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed qua the respective petitioners. Since State maehineiy has been used and the chargesheet has been filed, the petitioners in both the petitions shall deposit Rs.5,000/- each with the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre within four weeks. The original receipts of depositing the cost shall be filed by the petitioners in the Registry within six weeks and a copy thereof be also handed over to the

10. In case the receipts is not filed by the petitioners within the stipulated period, the matter shall be listed before Court for further directions. The petition stands disposed of. Dasti.

MAY 07, 2015/jk