Shyam Sunder v. Neelam Meena And ANR

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1102/2013 SHYAM SUNDER ..... Plaintiff Through: appearance not given versus NEELAM MEENA AND ANR ..... Defendant Through: Mr Milan Tyagi, Adv

CORAM:

DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

O R D E R

% 16.02.2016 In view of notification no 27187/DHC/Orgl. Dated 24.11.2015 & in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 23 of 2015), which came into force with effect from 26.10.2015 vide Notification No. F. No. L-19015/04/2012-Jus dated 26.10.2015 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, published in Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3 Sub Section (ii), the present matter stands transferred to the jurisdictional subordinate courts.

Learned counsel for the parties submits that the valuation of the suit property for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction is less than two crores and suit property falls with the jurisdiction of South-East District as such requests to send the matter to the Ld District & Session Judge (South-East District), Saket Court.

Hence, in view of the submission and circumstances, the matter be sent to the Ld District & Session Judge, (South-East District) Saket Court.

Parties be directed to appear before the Court of Ld District & Session Judge (South-East District), Saket Court on 19.07.2016. The suit files be made available to the Ld District & Session Judge (South-East District) at Saket Court on the date fixed. DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) At this stage, Mr Pramod Ahuja, Advocate appeared on behalf of defendant and was apprised of the above order. DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) FEBRUARY 16, 2016 SK