Shamlal Malhotra& ORS v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1346/2018 & Crl. M.A. 4908/2018 SHAMLAL MALHOTRA& ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Nakul Jain, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State.

Mr. Adit S Pujari, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 13.03.2020 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been filed inadvertently assuming that the summons i.e., Annexure P-6 were issued on the complaint filed under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. However, later on during the inspection of the record it was revealed that the said summons were issued only on the point of limitation. 2.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

3.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 13, 2020 ga