← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1583/2018

Vikas Chaudhary v. State Of NCT & ANR

2018-04-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva3 pages

$-3 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 NAVEEN JINDAL Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ajay Kumar and Mr. Sandeep, Advs.

versus STATE OF NOT & ANR Respondents Through:

Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashish Kumar + CRL.M.C. 1583/2018 VIKAS CHAUDHARY Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ajay Kumar and Mr. Sandeep, Advs.

versus STATE OF NOT & ANR Respondents Through:

Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashish Kumar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

ORDER

% 23.04.2018 1.

The petitioner, in CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 seeks quashing of FIR No. 1131 of 2015 under Sections 324/341of the IPC Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi and Petitioner in CRL.M.C. 1583/2018 seeks quashing of FIR No. 1132 of 2015 under Sections 323/341 of the IPC Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 & 1583/2018 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

2.

In Crl. M.C. 1583/2018, the amended petition has been filed. The same is taken on record.

3.

The subject FlRs are cross FlRs and were registered consequent to a quarrel which took place on account of payment of some commission charges consequent to a sale of property. 4.

The parties are neighbours and live in the same locality. With the intervention of the respectable members of the locality, the parties have settled their dispute and have agreed to live peacefully. 5.

Both the parties are present in person in Court today, represented by their counsels and identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled their all disputes with the intervention of locals and respectable people of the locality. They further submit that they do not wish to press the criminal complaints against each other any further.

6.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties has been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would also be expedient to quash the subject FlRs and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

7.

In view of the above, the petitions are allowed. FIR No. 1131 of 2015 under Sections 324/341 of the IPG Police Station Bhajanpura, CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 & 1583/2018

u Delhi and FIR No. 1132 of 2015 under Sections 323/341 of the IPC Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are, accordingly quashed. 8.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. APRIL 23,2018 SAN^V SACHDEVA, J Vs'

CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 & 1583/2018