Rajay Shahdeo & ANR v. State & ANR

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2296/2014 RAJAY SHAHDEO & ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Gauravjeet S.Narwan, Adv.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Akshai Malik, APP for State Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

O R D E R

% 16.09.2016 1.

Noting that the settlement does not embrace the petitioners No.1 and 2 in the instant petition, the counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition stating that the petitioner intends to enter into a settlement with respondent No.2 : the complainant, and then seek quashing of the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Needless to state if the petitioner enters into a settlement with the complainant a cause of action would accrue to the petitioners afresh to seek quashing of the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 3.

The petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Crl.M.A.No.7699/2014 Dismissed as infructuous.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 dkb