Kuldeep Kumar Jain And ORS v. Dvb Employees Terminal Fund-2002 And ORS

5 and 6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C)3747/2014and C.M.Nos.7572/2014&1168-69/2015 MAHENDRAGUPTAAND ORS Petitioners Through:

Mr. ManishSharma,Advocatewith Ms. Chandni Mehra, Advocate.

versus DVB EMPLOYEESTERMINALFUND-2002AND ORS Respondents Through;

Ms. MeenakshiMidha,Advocatefor respondent No.1.

Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate for respondent No.2.

•k) + W.P.(C)3749/2014and C.M.Nos.7576/2014&1170-71/2015 KULDEEPKUMARJAINAND ORS Petitioners Through;

Mr. ManishSharma,Advocatewith Ms. Chandni Mehra, Advocate.

versus DVB EMPLOYEESTERMINALFUND-2002AND ORS .... Respondents Through;

Ms. MeenakshiMidha,Advocatefor respondenfNo.l.

Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate for respondent No.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA

ORDER

o/o 21.01.2015 L After arguments, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressedwithlibertyto file freshwritpetitionsprovidedthatin the freshwrit W.P.(C)Nos.3747/2014&3749/2014 By:AMULYA

V petitionsthe petitionerswho have takenVRS show that in accordancewith the VRS scheme in which they took VRS, the petitioners are entitled to benefit of the pension etc now claimed. The fresh writ petitions must contain the VRS scheme and also make reference to the relevant clause showingas to how VRS employeessuch as the petitionerswho had taken VRS can get pension etc.

2.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. VALMIKIJ. MEHTA, J JANUARY 21,2015 Ne W.P.(C)Nos.3747/2014&3749/2014