Chorsiya Farm House Its Ar Shri Chandan Rana v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And Ros.
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3705/2024 CHORSIYA FARM HOUSE ITS AR SHRI CHANDAN RANA .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Pankaj Bharadwaj, Ms. Apoorva Pandita, Ms.
Aarushi Pandita, Advocates versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC-CRL for the State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 06.03.2025 1.
The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 150/2024 dated 27.02.2024 PS Fatehpur Beri under Sections 288/337 Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2.
In compliance of the directions of this Court vide order dated 10.01.2025, the Investigating Officer has placed on record the medical opinion given by the Specialist doctor, Fortis Hospital, which reads as under:
"Reply of Queries as per Hon'ble High Order
02. On February 28, 2025, Mr. Vipin was examined in the outpatient department by Dr. Dhruv Vikaram Zutshi, Neurologist, and Dr. Manoj The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:27:49
Miglani, Orthopaedic Specialist. The medical opinions are as follows:- I. Patient Mr. Vipin is suffering from Severe Tremlouness on standing and action and having action induced dyskinesia. Patient is having severe action and postural induced tremor and dysfunction.
II. Patient is unable to stand and walk despite optimal treatment. Patient is also having mild dysarthria as now of the neurological deficit.
III. The Supracondylar fractures in both femurs have united and he is able to bear weight on both lower limbs but at present he is unable to walk due to neurological problems.
IV. No timeline can be given in term of able to walk independently again and be capable to earn his livelihood due to the severity of the deficit, which constitutes a long-term disability."
(Emphasis supplied) 3.
The I.O. shall place the aforesaid medical report on record of the Trial Court along with Supplementary charge-sheet.
4.
Learned ASC is directed to place the aforesaid medical opinion record of this file.
5.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner states he does not wish to press the petition.
6.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J MARCH 6, 2025/hp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:27:49