Rajan Adlakha v. Registrar Oftrademarks & ANR.

$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)-IPD 61/2025 RAJAN ADLAKHA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Utkarsh Gupta, Ms. Shruti Gupta and Ms. Sanidhya Sharma, Advocates (Through VC) versus REGISTRAR OFTRADEMARKS & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr.

Om Ram and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 09.12.2025 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has received a copy of the order dated 01.12.2025 holding that the opposition has been abandoned under Rule 45(2) of the Trademark Rule, 2017. 2.

He states that the petitioner has also received the registration certificate dated 01.12.2025.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent has handed over a copy of the order dated 01.12.2025 and the registration certificate dated 01.12.2025. The compliance is taken on record.

4.

Respondent is directed to e-file these documents, within one (1) week. 5.

The compliance is taken on record.

6.

The registry is directed not to list this matter anymore. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J DECEMBER 9, 2025/rhc The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/12/2025 at 13:17:25