Verizon Trademark Services Llc & ORS. v. Veriz Consulting Private Limited & ORS.

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1056/2024, I.As. 46510/2024 & 46511/2024 VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through:

Ms. Vaishali Mittal and Mr. Shivang Sharma, Advocates.

versus VERIZ CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendants Through:

Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Yash Narain, Advocates for D4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 17.03.2026 1.

This suit is instituted by the Plaintiffs seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 and all others acting on its behalf from providing, marketing, selling, offering, or making for sale, any goods or services using the marks/trade names 'VERIZ', 'VERIZ CONSULTING', 'VERIZ CONSULTING PVT LTD' and/or their variants such as domain name www.verizconsulting.com, email address hr@verizconsulting.com and/or any mark or name/domain name/email ID using the trademark VERIZON and/or its formative marks and/or any other mark deceptively similar thereto, amongst other reliefs. 2.

During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where Plaintiffs have settled the matter with Defendant No.4 and executed a Settlement Agreement dated 03.02.2026, incorporating the terms of settlement.

3.

Ms. Vaishali Mittal, learned counsel for the Plaintiffs submits that the suit be decreed in favour of the Plaintiffs and against Defendant No. 4 since CS(COMM) 1056/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 12:46:03

Defendant No. 1 was dropped earlier and Defendant No. 2 is the DNR, which has complied with Court's orders while Defendant No. 3 is John Doe and no reliefs are pressed against them.

4.

Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiffs and against Defendant No.4 in terms of the Settlement Agreement, which shall form a part of the decree and terms thereof shall bind the parties thereto. Plaintiffs do not press any relief against Defendants No. 1 to 3. 5.

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 6.

Suit is disposed of along with pending applications. 7.

Plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870.

JYOTI SINGH, J MARCH 17, 2026/YA CS(COMM) 1056/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 12:46:03