Samina Khatun v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And ORS

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16788/2025 & CM APPL. 69000/2025, CM APPL. 69001/2025 SAMINA KHATUN .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr.

Piyush Kumar Singh and Ms. Renu, Advs.

versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Beenashw N. Soni, Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. Mansi Jain, Adv.

Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI with Mr. Noor Alam, Adv. for R-3 & 5.

Inspector Mantosh Kumar, PSShalimar Bagh, for R-3 & R-5.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 24.11.2025 1.

Since the petitioner has a vending certificate in the category of "food/snack with gas cylinder/fire", the petitioner, in our opinion, ought not to have been termed/treated as a mobile vendor, as the vending activity with the assistance of gas/fire cannot be mobile.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2025 at 15:37:31

2.

That being so, we deem it appropriate to permit the petitioner to vend in accordance with law provided that all other conditions are duly complied with by the petitioner.

3.

The present petition stands disposed of in terms of the above. 4.

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 24, 2025/sky/sk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/11/2025 at 15:37:31