Jose Philip Vadayil v. State

/ 45#&46#$ *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN.

652/2018 JOSE PHILIP VAE)AXIL I;

..... Petitioner , J Represented by: !^. Harshal Guipta, Advocate: '

I I .. " 'Versus I ^ - STATE - ;.... Respondent '

, :

' Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan; ^ - , .

: , '

for State with SI Meetu Yadav, \ ,PS Sunlight Colony.

I ' -+ , , I BAIL APPLN. 653/2018 . / - ' V'/ '

; ANY JOSE • \ Petitioner ^ > Represented by: Mn Harshal Gupta, Advocate. , I versus .

I ^ STATE '

..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP . for State with SI Meetu Yadav, PS Sunlight Colony.

'

.

I CORAMC - A,.

:

A- , " - HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA '4.

ORDER

% 23.03.2018 CrI. M.A. No. 5528/2018 (Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN. 652/2018 Crl. M.A. No. 5529/2018 (Exemptionl in BAIL APPLN. 653/2018 Allowed, subject to all just,exceptions.

BAIL APPLN.

652/2018 BAIL APPLN.

653/2018 By this petition the petitioners seek ahticipatbry bail in case FIR 'No.316/2017 under Sections 498A/,506/34 IPC registered .at PS Sunlight Colony, New Delhi.

BAIL APPLN. 652/2018 and 653/2018 Page 1 of 2 } Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

^ * The petitioners are the parents-in-law of the complainant. Learned APP for State on instructions from the Investigating Officer submits that till date no permission has been sought by the Investigation Officer for arrest of the petitioners from the competent authority. Thus the petitions are pre-mature.

Petitions are accordingly disposed of directing the Investigating Officer that in case an approval is sought and granted for the arrest of the petitioners, two weeks' notice prior to arrest will be issued to the petitioners. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MARCH 23, 2018 'vn'

BAIL APPLN. 652/2018 and 653/2018