Aaditya Khurana v. State NCT Of Delhi & ORS.

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7905/2025 AADITYA KHURANA .....Petitioner Through:

Petitioner with his counsel Mr. Arun Malik, Mr. Arjun Malik, Ms. Aarohi Malik and Mr. Kharanshu Rana, Advs.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State along with SI Roop Singh PS Kalkaji.

R-2 to R-3 with their counsel Mr.Pankaj Gupta and Mr.Akash Singh, Advs.

R-4 with his counsel Mr. Akshansh Sharma, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 10.11.2025 1.

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR bearing No. 0735/2021, registered at Police Station Kalkaji, New Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279/304-A/337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC‟). 2.

Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State and the learned counsels accept notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4. 3.

The petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 4 are present before this Court The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

and have been identified by his counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned.

4.

Brief facts of the case are that on 24-25.10.2021, an incident had taken place near Nehru Place Flyover. It is stated that the petitioner was driving his car bearing no. DL 9C CR 9199, which had collided with a Tempo (Mahindra Champion) bearing no. DL 1LU 0502, being driven by the deceased Late Mr. Radheyshyam, while respondent No. 2 was travelling/ sitting in the rear carrier of the said Tempo. It is further stated that on the basis of the aforesaid allegations, the present FIR was registered at the instance of respondent no. 2 against the petitioner under the relevant Sections.

5.

On a query made by this Court, respondent nos. 2 to 4, who are present before this Court, state that the parties have settled the disputes between themselves vide Memorandum of Settlement/Compromise dated 10.04.2024. In terms of the said settlement, the parties have received the entire settlement amount of ₹ 32 lakhs from the petitioner and have no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

6.

The learned APP for the State submits that the State also has no objection to the quashing of the present FIR 7.

In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 8.

Accordingly, FIR bearing no. . 0735/2021, registered at Police Station The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Kalkaji, New Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279/304-A/337 of the IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

9.

The petition stands disposed of.

10.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 10, 2025/A The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.