← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./9438/2024

Gaurav & ORS. v. State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

2024-12-03Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani3 pages

$~69 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 9438/2024 and CRL.M.A. 36235/2024 GAURAV & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra and Ms.

Archana Mishra, Advocates.

Petitioners in court.

versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State with SI Sandeep Kumar, P.S.:

Ambedkar Nagar.

Mr. Sanjay Bhatnagar, Advocate for R2 with R2 in court.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 03.12.2024 CRL.M.A. 36234/2024 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.

CRL.M.A. 36236/2024 By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 ('BNSS'), the petitioner seeks condonation of 188 days' delay in re-filing the petition. 2.

For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed.

3.

Delay in re-filing the petition is condoned.

4.

Petition is taken on Board.

5.

The application stands disposed-of.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

6.

By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BNSS, the petitioners, who are the former husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No.2, seek quashing of case FIR No.596/2021 dated 25.10.2021 registered under sections 498-A/ 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') at P.S.: Ambedkar Nagar, South Delhi.

7.

The petition is premised on Settlement dated 04.03.2024 arrived at through mediation before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi;

and Divorce Decree dated 23.03.2024, which is the culmination of petitions under sections 13B(1) and 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, whereby the parties had sought dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent.

8.

The petition is supported by affidavits of the petitioners, as also of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 9.

The petitioners as well as respondent No.2 are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.

10.

The parties have confirmed that no child was born from the wed-lock. 11.

No appeal is stated to have been filed from the divorce decree. 12.

The court has queried respondent No. 2, who confirms that she has taken divorce by mutual consent; and that a settlement has been entered into between the parties; and that in full-and-final settlement of all her claims including towards maintenance (past, present and future), stridhan, dowry articles, jewellery, permanent alimony, etc., she was to receive a sum of Rs.4,50,000/-from petitioner No.1; out of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

which Rs.3,00,000/- was paid earlier and Rs.1,50,000/- has been paid in court today, in compliance of the terms of the settlement. Respondent No.2 confirms that all aspects of the settlement have now been performed.

13.

Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

14.

In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 15.

Accordingly, case FIR No.596/2021 dated 25.10.2021 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC at P.S.: Ambedkar Nagar, South Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.

16.

Petition stands disposed-of.

17.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J DECEMBER 3, 2024 ds The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.