Rawail Singh v. Sammi Gupta

$~A-19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 335/2016 and CM No. 13178/2016 RAWAIL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rajender Chhhabra, Advocate.

versus SAMMI GUPTA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Mohit Gupta, son of Smt.Sammi Gupta/respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 12.01.2017 The limited grievance of the petitioner is that by the impugned order dated 14.12.2015, an additional cost of Rs.20,000/- has been imposed which is on account of the delay in paying the earlier cost of Rs. 30,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen and not financially well off. Mr. Mohit Gupta, son of Smt. Sammi Gupta, the respondent, who is present in person however submits that the averment of the learned counsel for the petitioner is incorrect and that the petitioner is a wealthy person carrying on the business of money lending and he also holds important positions in various institutions.

In the interest of justice, the cost as imposed by the trial court of Rs.20,000/- is reduced to Rs. 10,000/-. This amount be paid to the respondent.

In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

JANUARY 12, 2017/rb JAYANT NATH, J