Ramesh v. State

$~41 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 894/2018 RAMESH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Sumit Verma, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC.

W/ASI S.Devi, PS North Rohini.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 23.03.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report not filed.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 12.03.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `10,000/-. Crl.A.495/2013 was dismissed by this Court on 03.11.2017. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone six years and eight months incarceration besides remission for one year, three months and twenty-seven days as on 06.03.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. He has not availed any interim bail or parole during his detention.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J MARCH 23, 2018 / tr